<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health License Defense &#187; Physician Profile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/tag/physician-profile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b</link>
	<description>The blogs of our partners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is the Newsletter Back?</title>
		<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/08/is-the-newsletter-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/08/is-the-newsletter-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Porter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Board Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physician Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who  has practiced medicine in Texas for more than the last three years will remember that each quarter, they would receive a newsletter from the Texas Medical Board.  This newsletter would have information about the Board members, an editorial from the Executive Director and sometimes information about a new rule.  But the majority of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who  has practiced medicine in Texas for more than the last three years will remember that each quarter, they would receive a newsletter from the Texas Medical Board.  This newsletter would have information about the Board members, an editorial from the Executive Director and sometimes information about a new rule.  But the majority of the newsletter was a list of all the disciplinary action the Board took against its licensees since that last quarter. </p>
<p>In truth, the newsletter never went away, they just stopped mailing out to save money.  It still publishes it on the Board’s website, if you know where to look.  That may soon change.</p>
<p>The TMB only sends out newsletter by email to a list that is kept manually.  The Board staff is looking into capturing emails during licensure process for new licensees.  It is also looking at putting a button on website in order to opt-in to the newsletter.  The Board currently asks on renewal if licensees would like to receive the newsletter.  Maybe 15% of licensees have opted not to receive emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/08/is-the-newsletter-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Proposed Reporting Rules for Physician Assistants</title>
		<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/06/new-proposed-reporting-rules-for-physician-assistants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/06/new-proposed-reporting-rules-for-physician-assistants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Porter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[felony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physician Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Board of Physician Assistants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/06/new-proposed-reporting-rules-for-physician-assistants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Board of Physician Assistants has proposed new rules on information that a Physician Assistant is required to affirmatively report to the Board within 30 days. The proposed rule is:
New §185.27, relating to Duty to Report Certain Conduct to the Board, sets out requirements for physician assistants to report certain events to the PA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Texas Board of Physician Assistants has proposed new rules on information that a Physician Assistant is required to affirmatively report to the Board within 30 days. The proposed rule is:</p>
<p>New §185.27, relating to Duty to Report Certain Conduct to the Board, sets out requirements for physician assistants to report certain events to the PA Board within 30 days of their occurrence.<br />
Rule 185.27 requires reporting within 30 days of:<br />
A) address change,<br />
B) incarceration in a state or federal penitentiary,<br />
C) Any activity concerning a felony offense,<br />
D) Misdemeanors relating to<br />
a. PA responsibilities,<br />
b. morale turpitude,<br />
c. assaultive offenses (except fine only offenses),<br />
d. registering as a sex offender,<br />
e. violating a protective order, including offenses involving bias or prejudice.<br />
f. Being found guilty of offenses involving<br />
i. controlled substances &amp; dangerous drugs<br />
ii. inhalant paraphernalia<br />
iii. guilty of felony under Drug Abuse Prevention &amp; Control Act</p>
<p>If you support or oppose this rule change, you may voice your opinion to the Board as these rules currently are in its comment period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/06/new-proposed-reporting-rules-for-physician-assistants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes Coming in Delegation of Prescriptive Authority?</title>
		<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/11/changes-coming-in-delegation-of-prescriptive-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/11/changes-coming-in-delegation-of-prescriptive-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Porter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-level providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physician Assistant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physician Assistant Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physician Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prescriptive delegation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Board of Nurses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board staff met with the representatives of the Texas Nursing Board and the Department of Public Safety regarding prescriptive delegation for mid-level providers.  They discussed the two methods that mid-level providers to prescribe scheduled drugs:
 (1) The mid-level providers can obtain there own certification with the DEA and DPS.  Their individual certification number must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Medical Board staff met with the representatives of the Texas Nursing Board and the Department of Public Safety regarding prescriptive delegation for mid-level providers.  They discussed the two methods that mid-level providers to prescribe scheduled drugs:</p>
<p> (1) The mid-level providers can obtain there own certification with the DEA and DPS.  Their individual certification number must appear on their prescription pad and they are required to have a supervisor relationship with a licensed physician.  This person is viewed as a “sponsor.”</p>
<p> (2) There must be a standing protocol for the mid-level provider to prescribe using the physician’s prescription pad for the listed symptoms and only prescribe medications that are listed in the protocol for the symptoms. </p>
<p> The parties meet to discuss creating a field on the Texas Medical Board’s Physician Profile that will list all of the mid-level providers under the physician’s sponsorship who have prescriptive authority.</p>
<p> The Texas Medical Board’s Standing Delegation Committee voted to create a sub-committee with the Physician Assistant Board and the Nursing Board to look into the guidelines for supervising physicians over PA’s and APN’s who have prescriptive authority under the physician’s supervision.   Their goal is to have everyone on the same page as to what the rules are and the risks involved in prescriptive delegation.</p>
<p> <span style="text-decoration: underline">My Take</span>: First, physicians and mid-levels need to be sure they are in full compliance with current level and the correct paper work is in the Board denoting the supervisor relationship.  Second, look for the rules to be changed in the future.  If you have three boards get together, I can assure you the rules will change.  Given the current regulatory climate, I suspect that rules will tighten-up.  I just hope that before the Boards publish any rule changes, they talk and meet with “stake holders” in this area as any changes to mid-level prescriptive authority will have significant affect over thousands of providers.  Please continue to monitor this blog for changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/11/changes-coming-in-delegation-of-prescriptive-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
