<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health License Defense &#187; PHP. Physicians Health Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/tag/php-physicians-health-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b</link>
	<description>The blogs of our partners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:10:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Rule Changes Proposed By the Texas Medical Board</title>
		<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/07/more-rule-changes-proposed-by-the-texas-medical-board/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/07/more-rule-changes-proposed-by-the-texas-medical-board/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Porter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Practitioner's Databank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP. Physicians Health Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician-patient relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas medical license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 16th, the Texas Medical Board published it proposed rule changes to be considered at it next Board meeting in August.  It is important for licensees and other interested parties to review these rules to determine how it affects you and your practice. 
 If you support or oppose a rule change, you can write to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 16<sup>th</sup>, the Texas Medical Board published it proposed rule changes to be considered at it next Board meeting in August.  It is important for licensees and other interested parties to review these rules to determine how it affects you and your practice. </p>
<p> If you support or oppose a rule change, you can write to the Board with any concern you may have.  The following are the proposed changes:</p>
<p><strong> </strong>Proposed Rules General Provisions – Meetings The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to <span style="text-decoration: underline">§161.5,</span> concerning Meetings. The amendment to</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§161.5</span></strong> provides that <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">adoption of committee minutes are to be approved by the full board rather than by the individual committees.</span></strong></p>
<p>Proposed Rules Licensure – Examinations Accepted for Licensure &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§163.6,</span></strong> concerning Examinations Accepted for Licensure. The amendment to</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§163.6</span></strong> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">clarifies that if an applicant takes multiple types of licensure examinations, attempts at comparable sections shall be combined to determine eligibility for licensure</span></strong>.<em> (counting towards the 3 attempts)</em> Language is currently under a different subsection, and the language is being moved to be cleared on its application.</p>
<p>Proposed Rules Medical Records &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §165.1, concerning Medical Records. The amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§165.1</span></strong> provides that <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">physicians receiving medical records from other practitioners in relation to the treatment of a specific patient, must only keep those records that are salient to the patient&#8217;s treatment.</span></strong></p>
<p>(This rule change I have a question about.  Who decides what is “salient” to the patient’s treatment.  Likewise, what does it mean to the doctor if he or she did not obtain “salient” records?)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Proposed Rules Telemedicine &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §174.2 and proposes new §§174.7, 174.9 and 174.11, concerning Telemedicine. The</p>
<p>amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§174.2,</span></strong> concerning <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Definitions</span></strong>, defines distant site provider, established medical site, face-to-face visit, patient site location, patient site presenter; amends the definitions for physician-patient e-mail, telemedicine medical services; and deletes the definition for telepresenter.</p>
<p> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">New §174.7</span></strong>, concerning Telemedicine Medical Services Provided at Sites other than an Established Medical Site,</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">establishes under what conditions a distant site provider may provide telemedicine medical services at sites other than an established medical site, such as a patient&#8217;s home</span></strong>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">New §174.9</span></strong>, concerning Technology and Security Requirements, establishes <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">requirements relating to technology and security regarding the provision of telemedicine medical services and physician-patient communications</span></strong> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">through e-mail</span></strong>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">New §174.11</span></strong>, concerning <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">On-call Services, establishes that physicians in the same specialty who provide reciprocal services may provide on-call telemedicine medical services for each other&#8217;s patients. </span></strong></p>
<p>Proposed Rules Fees and Penalties – Application Fees &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§175.1</span></strong>, concerning <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Application Fees</span></strong>. The amendment to §175.1 <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">eliminates application fees for regular temporary licenses for distinguished professor temporary licenses and adds the fee amount for a regular temporary license to the application fee for full licensure, provisional licenses, telemedicine licenses, reissuance of licenses following revocation, and administrative license</span></strong>.</p>
<p>Proposed Rules Certification of Non-Profit Health Organizations – Complaint Procedure Notification The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to  <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§177.13</span></strong>, concerning Complaint Procedure Notification. The amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§177.13</span></strong> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">updates the name of the Texas Medical Board</span></strong> as used in this chapter.  <em>Formerly the notice just said &#8220;the board&#8221;</em></p>
<p> Proposed Rules Investigations – Requests for Information and Records from Physicians &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §179.4, concerning Requests for Information and Records from Physicians. The amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§179.4 clarifies that this section applies in all respects to licensure applicants</span></strong>.</p>
<p> Proposed Rules Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitation Orders – Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitations Orders The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §§180.2 &#8211; 180.4, concerning Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitation Orders. The amendment to</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§180.2,</span></strong> concerning <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">Definitions</span></strong>, <em><span style="text-decoration: underline">adds that the Texas Physician Health and Rehabilitation Committee shall also be referred to as the TXPHP Advisory Committee.</span></em> The amendment to §180.3, concerning Texas Physician Health Program (PHP), amends language to be consistent with the proposed amendments to §180.2.</p>
<p>The <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">amendment to §180.4</span></strong>, concerning Operation of Program, provides that the <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">drug vendor used by the PHP must be approved by the Texas Medical Board, and establishes standards for processing referrals, requiring evaluations, settings terms for agreements with participants, and facilitating interventions.</span></strong></p>
<p> (I take some issue with this too.  The TxPHP should be given the freedom to enter into its own contracts without the Board being involved in it.  I am concerned about the relationship between the Board and the current vendor, First Advantage.)</p>
<p> Proposed Rules Procedural Rules &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §187.27, concerning Written Answers in SOAH Proceedings and Default Orders, and §187.81, concerning Reports on Imposition of Administrative Penalty. The amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§187.27</span></strong> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">corrects an incorrect citation</span></strong>. The amendment to §187.81 requires that <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">disciplinary orders that impose administrative penalties related to the delivery of health care services must be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank</span></strong>.</p>
<p> (I have a big problem with this.  A fine should not be reported to the NPDB.  Fines are given out like candy at the Board and usually the licensees are ok with a fine if this matter is not given to the NPDB.  This change is really going to make settling cases more difficult than they already are.) </p>
<p>Proposed Rules Disciplinary Guidelines – Violation Guidelines &#8211; The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §190.8, concerning Violation Guidelines. The</p>
<p>amendment to<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline"> §190.8</span></strong> provides that (1) <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">a physician-patient relationship is not necessary when a physician prescribes medications to a patient&#8217;s family members if the patient has an illness determined to be pandemic</span></strong>; and (2) <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">unprofessional conduct includes contacting a member of a peer review body for purposes of intimidation in relation to a board investigation.</span></strong></p>
<p>Proposed Rules Standing Delegation Orders – Delegation of the Carrying out or Signing of Prescription Drug Orders to Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Nurses The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §193.6, concerning Delegation of the Carrying Out or Signing of Prescription Drug Orders to Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Nurses. The amendment to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">§193.6</span></strong> <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline">clarifies that certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) who only sign or carry out prescription drug orders are not required to register with the Board.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>Withdrawn Rule Telemedicine &#8211; The Texas Medical Board withdraws the proposed amendment to §174.2 and new §§174.7, 174.9, and 174.11 which appeared in the April 30, 2010, issue of the Texas Register (35 TexReg 3390) <strong>35 TexReg 6283</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2010/07/more-rule-changes-proposed-by-the-texas-medical-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP May Effect People Under Investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/10/php-may-effect-people-under-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/10/php-may-effect-people-under-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Porter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP. Physicians Health Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Medical Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMB attorney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/10/php-may-effect-people-under-investigation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a question that I have received lots of e-mails and phone calls on regarding the Physicians Health Program (PHP) that is set to be operational in January 2010.  
What is the TMB doing with rehab cases that either have not yet had an ISC or do not have an Order which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a question that I have received lots of e-mails and phone calls on regarding the Physicians Health Program (PHP) that is set to be operational in January 2010.  </p>
<p>What is the TMB doing with rehab cases that either have not yet had an ISC or do not have an Order which will be ready by the November meeting? There must be several of these.</p>
<p>Currently, the plan is review each case individually as the investigation is resolved.  Then determine if there are any criminal concerns, diversion of narcotics or harm to patients as a result of the addiction.  If the answer is no, they will likely be referred to the PHP once it is operational.  If the answer is yes to those questions, those investigations will be sent to an ISC for a disciplinary hearing.  If the ISC Panel agrees there is one or more of those problems, then those individuals will be subject to a public disciplinary order by the Board.  Of course, as the PHP is still in its development stages and the Board still is not fully sure how it is all going to work, all of this is subject to change. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthlicensedefense.com/b/2009/10/php-may-effect-people-under-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
