Health License Defense » National Practitioner’s Databank

More Rule Changes Proposed By the Texas Medical Board

Jon Porter — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:54:51 +0000

On July 16^th, the Texas Medical Board published it proposed rule changes to be considered at it next Board meeting in August. It is important for licensees and other interested parties to review these rules to determine how it affects you and your practice.

If you support or oppose a rule change, you can write to the Board with any concern you may have. The following are the proposed changes:

Proposed Rules General Provisions – Meetings The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §161.5, concerning Meetings. The amendment to

§161.5 provides that adoption of committee minutes are to be approved by the full board rather than by the individual committees.

Proposed Rules Licensure – Examinations Accepted for Licensure – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §163.6, concerning Examinations Accepted for Licensure. The amendment to

§163.6 clarifies that if an applicant takes multiple types of licensure examinations, attempts at comparable sections shall be combined to determine eligibility for licensure. (counting towards the 3 attempts) Language is currently under a different subsection, and the language is being moved to be cleared on its application.

Proposed Rules Medical Records – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §165.1, concerning Medical Records. The amendment to §165.1 provides that physicians receiving medical records from other practitioners in relation to the treatment of a specific patient, must only keep those records that are salient to the patient’s treatment.

(This rule change I have a question about. Who decides what is “salient” to the patient’s treatment. Likewise, what does it mean to the doctor if he or she did not obtain “salient” records?)

Proposed Rules Telemedicine – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §174.2 and proposes new §§174.7, 174.9 and 174.11, concerning Telemedicine. The

amendment to §174.2, concerning Definitions, defines distant site provider, established medical site, face-to-face visit, patient site location, patient site presenter; amends the definitions for physician-patient e-mail, telemedicine medical services; and deletes the definition for telepresenter.

New §174.7, concerning Telemedicine Medical Services Provided at Sites other than an Established Medical Site,

establishes under what conditions a distant site provider may provide telemedicine medical services at sites other than an established medical site, such as a patient’s home.

New §174.9, concerning Technology and Security Requirements, establishes requirements relating to technology and security regarding the provision of telemedicine medical services and physician-patient communications through e-mail.

New §174.11, concerning On-call Services, establishes that physicians in the same specialty who provide reciprocal services may provide on-call telemedicine medical services for each other’s patients.

Proposed Rules Fees and Penalties – Application Fees – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §175.1, concerning Application Fees. The amendment to §175.1 eliminates application fees for regular temporary licenses for distinguished professor temporary licenses and adds the fee amount for a regular temporary license to the application fee for full licensure, provisional licenses, telemedicine licenses, reissuance of licenses following revocation, and administrative license.

Proposed Rules Certification of Non-Profit Health Organizations – Complaint Procedure Notification The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §177.13, concerning Complaint Procedure Notification. The amendment to §177.13 updates the name of the Texas Medical Board as used in this chapter. Formerly the notice just said “the board”

Proposed Rules Investigations – Requests for Information and Records from Physicians – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §179.4, concerning Requests for Information and Records from Physicians. The amendment to §179.4 clarifies that this section applies in all respects to licensure applicants.

Proposed Rules Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitation Orders – Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitations Orders The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §§180.2 – 180.4, concerning Texas Physician Health Program and Rehabilitation Orders. The amendment to

§180.2, concerning Definitions, adds that the Texas Physician Health and Rehabilitation Committee shall also be referred to as the TXPHP Advisory Committee. The amendment to §180.3, concerning Texas Physician Health Program (PHP), amends language to be consistent with the proposed amendments to §180.2.

The amendment to §180.4, concerning Operation of Program, provides that the drug vendor used by the PHP must be approved by the Texas Medical Board, and establishes standards for processing referrals, requiring evaluations, settings terms for agreements with participants, and facilitating interventions.

(I take some issue with this too. The TxPHP should be given the freedom to enter into its own contracts without the Board being involved in it. I am concerned about the relationship between the Board and the current vendor, First Advantage.)

Proposed Rules Procedural Rules – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §187.27, concerning Written Answers in SOAH Proceedings and Default Orders, and §187.81, concerning Reports on Imposition of Administrative Penalty. The amendment to §187.27 corrects an incorrect citation. The amendment to §187.81 requires that disciplinary orders that impose administrative penalties related to the delivery of health care services must be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank.

(I have a big problem with this. A fine should not be reported to the NPDB. Fines are given out like candy at the Board and usually the licensees are ok with a fine if this matter is not given to the NPDB. This change is really going to make settling cases more difficult than they already are.)

Proposed Rules Disciplinary Guidelines – Violation Guidelines – The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §190.8, concerning Violation Guidelines. The

amendment to §190.8 provides that (1) a physician-patient relationship is not necessary when a physician prescribes medications to a patient’s family members if the patient has an illness determined to be pandemic; and (2) unprofessional conduct includes contacting a member of a peer review body for purposes of intimidation in relation to a board investigation.

Proposed Rules Standing Delegation Orders – Delegation of the Carrying out or Signing of Prescription Drug Orders to Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Nurses The Texas Medical Board (Board) proposes amendments to §193.6, concerning Delegation of the Carrying Out or Signing of Prescription Drug Orders to Physician Assistants and Advanced Practice Nurses. The amendment to §193.6 clarifies that certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) who only sign or carry out prescription drug orders are not required to register with the Board.

Withdrawn Rule Telemedicine – The Texas Medical Board withdraws the proposed amendment to §174.2 and new §§174.7, 174.9, and 174.11 which appeared in the April 30, 2010, issue of the Texas Register (35 TexReg 3390) 35 TexReg 6283

A Disciplinary Action or Agreed Order Is Forever

Taralynn Mackay — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:10:11 +0000

Disciplinary actions or Agreed Orders remain on a nurse’s license forever. When stipulations/restrictions are placed on the license, the nurse’s license is encumbered and those restrictions show up on the license when the license is verified (for example, the verification page will show “Warning with Stipulations” or “Remedial Education”). Once the stipulations/restrictions are completed and the Board sends a letter of completion to the nurse, the verification page will show clear; however, the disciplinary history remains. If asked if the nurse has ever been sanctioned or disciplined*, the nurse will have to answer “yes.”

Recently, I have received several inquiries regarding “setting aside board orders.” This cannot be done and this is misinformation. While criminal incidents can sometimes be expunged or sealed, administrative actions currently cannot be removed from one’s license. Once a disciplinary action occurs, the history remains even once the “probation” is complete.

* The Texas BON currently asks, “Has any licensing authority refused to issue you a license or ever revoked, annulled, cancelled, accepted surrender of, suspended, placed on probation, refused to renew a professional license, certificate or multi-state privilege held by you now or previously, or ever fined, censured, reprimanded or otherwise disciplined you?” to obtain information about past disciplinary actions.

Trying to find a job while under a Board Order

Taralynn Mackay — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:30:09 +0000

I have heard from another nurse who is having a difficult time obtaining a job while under a Board Order. This is an ongoing problem especially in this economy. Some employers are refusing to hire a nurse no matter what the basis for the Order. Most nurses cannot afford to fight an Order in court or the facts of the nurse’s case are such that there is a definite violation and fighting in an administrative law court may not gain the nurse much. There are some solutions that can help:

1. Make sure you have malpractice insurance so that you have the financial resources to go to a hearing if you do not agree with the BON’s decision in your case.

2. When looking for a job, ask everyone you know for help in finding a job. It tends to be easier to get a job if someone is on the “inside” vouching for you and your skills. There are also employers out there that understand that most nurses with a Board Order are not “bad” nurses; that the nurse just made a mistake, or was overworked/understaffed, or had a disease relapse etc. These employers recognize that most nurses that have had a Board Order become extremely cautious nurses and become definite assets to the facility.

3. Make sure that you have an experienced and BON knowledgeable attorney assist you with your case before the BON so that you get the best outcome possible.

4. You must present a professional appearance (this includes your resume, your social networking site pages, and any application you complete).

5. Contact your state senators and representatives and ask them to make some changes for the next legislative session in 2011. Some areas that need changes: expand the corrective action provisions to apply to minor practice violations, allow non-public orders for mental health issues and substance abuse (these are diseases, so why allow the publicity?), allow deferred adjudications to be just that and not be considered a conviction by the BON, and change the language in the NPA from shall to may to allow the BON leeway to make determinations based on mitigating factors. As 2010 progresses, I will probably think of more…

I also have more info here: http://nursinglaw.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-to-explain-past-board-orders-to.html

Texas BON and the National Practioner’s DataBank

Taralynn Mackay — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:20:54 +0000

From the July 2009 BON meeting minutes, “Mary Beth Thomas reported that Texas continues to lead the nation in the numbers of cases submitted to the national data base. “ This reflects the Board’s continued increase in activity and yet another repercussion of a Board action.