When ratios were first discussed, I thought the law would be loosely written so that hospitals could “meet” the law, but there would be no visible improvement for nurses or patients.  That seems to be the case with Texas’ staffing law; I just don’t see any improvement and still receive multiple complaints from nurses that are being forced to work under unsafe staffing numbers and when they refuse the unsafe assignments they are charged with abandonment.   The article notes that other states are considering ratios.  Perhaps Texas will also consider changes to the law to protect nurses and patients, but history does not support this.  Nurses need to be politically active and join associations that promote nursing and fight for nursing laws; just complaining will do no good, nurses must take action and support the associations that work on legislative issues on behalf of nursing in Texas.  National organizations/associations will not focus on individual state issues so be sure to check into any association/organization you are thinking of joining to see what their legislative mandates/agendas are.

1.  Make sure you have malpractice insurance so that you have the financial resources to go to a hearing if you do not agree with the BON’s decision in your case.

2. When looking for a job, ask everyone you know for help in finding a job.  It tends to be easier to get a job if someone is on the “inside” vouching for you and your skills.  There are also employers out there that understand that most nurses with a Board Order are not “bad” nurses; that the nurse just made a mistake, or was overworked/understaffed, or had a disease relapse etc.  These employers recognize that most nurses that have had a Board Order become extremely cautious nurses and become definite assets to the facility.

3. Make sure that you have an experienced and BON knowledgeable attorney assist you with your case before the BON so that you get the best outcome possible.

4. You must present a professional appearance (this includes your resume, your social networking site pages, and any application you complete).

5. Contact your state senators and representatives and ask them to make some changes for the next legislative session in 2011.  Some areas that need changes: expand the corrective action provisions to apply to minor practice violations, allow non-public orders for mental health issues and substance abuse (these are diseases, so why allow the publicity?), allow deferred adjudications to be just that and not be considered a conviction by the BON, and change the language in the NPA from shall to may to allow the BON leeway to make determinations based on mitigating factors.   As 2010 progresses, I will probably think of more…

I also have more info here:  http://nursinglaw.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-to-explain-past-board-orders-to.html

 (1) The mid-level providers can obtain there own certification with the DEA and DPS.  Their individual certification number must appear on their prescription pad and they are required to have a supervisor relationship with a licensed physician.  This person is viewed as a “sponsor.”

 (2) There must be a standing protocol for the mid-level provider to prescribe using the physician’s prescription pad for the listed symptoms and only prescribe medications that are listed in the protocol for the symptoms. 

 The parties meet to discuss creating a field on the Texas Medical Board’s Physician Profile that will list all of the mid-level providers under the physician’s sponsorship who have prescriptive authority.

 The Texas Medical Board’s Standing Delegation Committee voted to create a sub-committee with the Physician Assistant Board and the Nursing Board to look into the guidelines for supervising physicians over PA’s and APN’s who have prescriptive authority under the physician’s supervision.   Their goal is to have everyone on the same page as to what the rules are and the risks involved in prescriptive delegation.

 My Take: First, physicians and mid-levels need to be sure they are in full compliance with current level and the correct paper work is in the Board denoting the supervisor relationship.  Second, look for the rules to be changed in the future.  If you have three boards get together, I can assure you the rules will change.  Given the current regulatory climate, I suspect that rules will tighten-up.  I just hope that before the Boards publish any rule changes, they talk and meet with “stake holders” in this area as any changes to mid-level prescriptive authority will have significant affect over thousands of providers.  Please continue to monitor this blog for changes.